Present study will be conducted as an interventional study in the form of nonequivalent to compare outcomes between two treatment modalities. In this study we will examine effectiveness and costs associated with adopting / implementing a new policy in Iran: “hospital-based home care”. Study’s sample includes patients with diabetic foot ulcers admitted to a teaching - referral hospital who after being assessed by the researchers are identified to have the inclusion criteria for the study such as decision of the physician to continue therapeutic process at home, having diabetic foot ulcers (based on Wegener classification system for foot wounds in grade 2, 3, 4 and ABI> 0, 5); patient's residency in Tehran, and the patient's consent. Patients who have the criteria are randomly assigned to the control or intervention group. in both groups, outcome indicators of the study include rate of HbA1c, patient's insulin regimen, rate of amputation, wound class, length of stay, patient satisfaction and quality of life. To determine whether two modalities have a significant difference in time of recovery (minimum error of 5%- and - power of 90%), the sample size was determined to include 120 patients, using a systematic sampling technique (30 patients in HBHC and 90 patients HBC). After including patients in the HBHC modality, they are trained about the process and purpose of the study, given an informed consent, introduced to home care providers, discharged from hospital and admitted to the HBHC.