Comparison of the effect of inguinal hernia repair using the progrip mesh on improving the quality of life relative to the prolene mesh and their complications
Design
Two arm parallel group randomised trial.
Settings and conduct
In this study, patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40, based on their inclusion criteria. The first group with progrip mesh and the second group with prolene mesh at the Ayatullah Rohani Babylon Medical Center are going under the hernia repair surgery. The amount of pain is assessed based on the visual scale (VAS) postoperation as well as on possible complications.
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
inclusion criteria:
Unilaterla inguinal hernia, age over 18 years old
exclusion criteria:
recurrence, bilateral, incarcerated inguinal hernia and femoral hernia
Intervention groups
40 patients as progrip mesh group
40 patients , as prolene mesh group
Main outcome variables
Postoperation pain; postoperation complications (hematoma, infection, urinary retention); life style
General information
Reason for update
Acronym
IRCT registration information
IRCT registration number:IRCT20171213037857N1
Registration date:2018-05-02, 1397/02/12
Registration timing:retrospective
Last update:2018-05-02, 1397/02/12
Update count:0
Registration date
2018-05-02, 1397/02/12
Registrant information
Name
Ali Zahedian Tijeneki
Name of organization / entity
Country
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Phone
+98 11 3225 6285
Email address
a.zahedian@mubabol.ac.ir
Recruitment status
Recruitment complete
Funding source
Expected recruitment start date
2017-08-23, 1396/06/01
Expected recruitment end date
2018-03-21, 1397/01/01
Actual recruitment start date
empty
Actual recruitment end date
empty
Trial completion date
empty
Scientific title
Comparison of the effect of inguinal hernia repair with Liechtenstein method with progrip mesh compared to prolene mesh in reducing complications
Public title
Comparison of surgical complications of inguinal hernia repair using two mesh types