-
Study aim
-
The aim of this study was the comparison between two karydakis and Limberg procedures in measuring the post-operation complication, pain, and satisfaction after 6 months by pain visual analog scale (VAS).
-
Design
-
A Single blind, randomized parallel clinical trial
-
Settings and conduct
-
Pilonidal disease is common in young man. While various surgical techniques have been defined for treating Intergluteal pilonidal disease (IPD), controversy still exists as to the best surgical technique. efficiency and short-term results of the Limberg flap with that of the Karydakis flap for treating IPD are still unclear. This study compares these 2 procedures in restoring the post-operation pain, satisfaction, complication, and recurrence during 6 months by VAS. This is the randomized Single-blind clinical trial being performed from October 2016 to September 2017 on pilonidal disease patients who met inclusion criteria in Imam Khomeini hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. The study participants were blinded using closed dressing.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria in the study were Pilonidal disease who referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital, Sari, Iran with an age limitation of 15-65 years.
Exclusion criteria were elderly patients with comorbidity diseases, scars from previous pilonidal surgery, abscess presentation, Patients with diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency, neurological disorder, drug addiction, alcoholism, ASA 3–4, those who are under 15 and over 65.
-
Intervention groups
-
The patients were assigned to two study groups; the Limberg Flap (LF) group and the Karydakis Flap (KF) group.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain, Complication, Satisfaction, Cosmetics, Recurrence