-
Study aim
-
Comparison of The effectivnes of using the toothbrush and chlorhexidine solution and Calendola solution in the prevention of oral cavity lesions in patients intubated in intensive care units
-
Design
-
The clinical trial has three groups of parallel, community-based, and pragmatic. Each group has 19 samples. Blind two-way is to random allocation method.
-
Settings and conduct
-
After obtaining the necessary permits, the research is done in the intubated patients of Sabzevar's intensive care units. The double-blind study is blind, the assessor and the consulor are blinded to the bias. Trials are performed at intervals of every 12 hours in three groups. The assessment is recorded at the reception and on the fourth and seventh day by the BOAS tool.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Obtain informed consent from the legal representative of the patient, intubated patient and in the range of 18 to 65 years old. Having at least 20 healthy teeth, no illness and severe damage to the oral cavity, no coagulation problems and hepatitis B disease, history of HIV and allergic history, no symptoms of aspiration, lack of cover and parcel, dentures and other orthodontic instruments, score greater than 5 The basis of BOAS, lack of pregnancy and lactation in women. Exit criteria: Dissatisfied with the legal representative of the patient to continue cooperation, withdrawal of the tracheal tube, observation of aspiration apparent
-
Intervention groups
-
The intervention group 1 consists of intubated patients in the intensive care unit who received: oral toothbrushing ,and control group 2 chlorhexidine solution with toothbrush, and intervention group 3 brush with calendola.
-
Main outcome variables
-
The main outcome is the primary outcome of oral cavity health based on the Boas instrument and the secondary outcome variable is the complications of oral cavity.