-
Study aim
-
Determine and comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in sedation efficacy in patients with elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
-
Design
-
Clinical trial phase3 with 2parallel groups, 3-sided blind, having balanced block randomization with considering gradual patient referral and sample size of 60
-
Settings and conduct
-
After obtaining written consent, patients who refers to Ali ibn Abitalib hospital for upper endoscopy, randomly assigned to 2groups of Dexmedomidine(D) and Propofol(P). Syringe of drugs will coded by an anesthetist who doesn't interfere with patient's sedation and evaluation process; it coded with a three-digit code, and patients divided according to the code for D or P group. Study is 3-sided blind, and patient, endoscopic physician, and person evaluating the symptoms are blinded to type of treatment group, and only a supervisor who prepares drugs and divides patients according to the code for each group, will know the treatment type received by patients.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Enter criteria:patients with elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with ASA class ≤3
Not-enter criteria:Having cardiovascular-liver- kidney- psychiatric disease, SBP<90, Drug Addiction, Egg and soy allergy, Emergency endoscopy
-
Intervention groups
-
In D group, Dexmedetomidine doses of 0.5μg/kg bolus and 0.7-0.5μg/Kg/hr infusion and in P group ,Propofol with doses of 0.5mg/kg bolus and 30μg/Kg/min infusion will given intravenously to patients. Patient hemodynamics will be checked and monitored from start of medication. Relaxation after taking drugs will asked using Ramsay Relaxation Scale from 0-5 (0-Restless,1-Relax,2-Sleepy,3-Confuse but Responded to Verbal Orders,4-No Response to Verbal orders,5-No Response to painful incitements) and will evaluated by an anesthesiologist. After patient becomes alert, sedation satisfaction will be asked.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Sedation