Effectiveness Comparison of Body- Mind Intervention in Virtual and Face to Face Method on Quality of Life in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Determining and Comparing the Effectiveness of Mind-Body Intervention in Two Virtual-in-person Methods on Quality of Life in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Clinical trial of control group, with randomized double-blind randomized parallel groups on 60 patients. Use of random number table for randomization

After obtaining informed consent from women undergoing polycystic ovary syndrome, they were then randomly assigned to two groups of virtual mind-body intervention (n = 30) and control group (n = 30). The two groups of 15 people are divided. The intervention group received 8 sessions of 2-hour counseling with physical therapy approach.Also, fasting blood glucose was measured in the laboratory of the Diabetes Polyclinic twice for the beginning of the study and at the end of week 8 in both groups for free. Yazd Diabetes Clinic Study Place

Married women of childbearing age, Iranian, literate, for both intervention groups, virtual and mobile, and Internet or iPhone Operating System(ios) for both groups, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome based on Rotterdam criteria and treated Being in a diabetes clinic.Willingness to have a fasting blood sugar test before the study and after the end of week 8 Exclusion: Participation in another study, self-reported history of other chronic mental and physical illnesses, use of other medications

Intervention group: Virtual physical counseling group. Control group: Physical Mental Counseling (8 sessions of two-hour physical counseling) before and after the eighth and twelfth week of quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Quality of Life, Satisfaction with the virtual and face-to-face counseling method, Fasting blood sugar

Restriction of words and failure to include a blood sugar test

Using computer random number table The researcher will begin to provide you with a framework for your statistical community, and you can guide yourself to 60 people who are known and invited as an official source. The researcher used to schedule tables for the visible sample of his eyes in the form of tables and fingers or the tip of a pen. Move between different levels or columns using this and employers to request funding. The selected number is actually the personality code of the budget community that is chosen by the sample. Each code, for example, was assigned to members of a virtual counseling group or face-to-face counseling so that you could arrange your samples in each group of 30 people.The final samples were called to a specific location, the purpose and method of work, and the right to freely participate or not to participate in the research were explained to them. Samples that did not wish to attend the sessions were excluded from the study. Then the required number of samples (30 people for each group) was selected. We again divided the members of each group by throwing coins into two groups of fifteen (B and A) so that if the milk procedure was visible, it belonged to group A, and if the line procedure appeared, it would belong to group B.