-
Study aim
-
The aim of this research is comparing the effects of magnet therapy, electroacupuncture and conventional physiotherapy. This study is single-blind clinical trial. Ninety three patients will refer to the Fattemieh physiotherapy clinic in Rafsanjan. Three intervention of this study are magnet therapy, electroacupuncture and conventional physiotherapy.
-
Design
-
In this study 3 group treatments will done through parallel design and assesses during 1st, 10th sessions and one month later
-
Settings and conduct
-
Assessor evaluate the patients then refer Fattemieh physiotherapy clinic in Rafsanjan city and then divided them in to 3 equal groups.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion: aged 45-75 years, Knee pain more than 3 months,
ability of walking, osteophyte in the knee,
reduction of joint space, cripitation of the knee movement,
grade 2 and 3 osteoarthritis of the knee and primary osteoarthritis of the knee.
Exclusion: Injection of corticosteroid during previous 1 month,
fracture and dislocation of the knee,
previous surgery of the knee,
pregnancy,
rheumatoid arthritis,
sever knee osteoarthritis (grade 4) and leaving of study.
-
Intervention groups
-
First group will receive magnet therapy by magnet set (made in Iran, magno 915 G model 20 HZ, 65 G intensity and using for 20 minutes).
Second group will receive electroacupuncture (needle is inserted to acupuncture points of knee osteoarthritis, then electrical stimulation connect to patients by stimulator set (made in chin, Ying Di 808 model, 3 HZ and during for 20 minutes).
Third group (conventional Physiotherapy) are include ultrasound set (made in Iran, 250 P model, Infrared and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) by stimulator set (made in Iran, 620 F) that applies for 20 minutes.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain intensity in rest, 6 minute walking test and WOMAC scale.