-
Study aim
-
Comparative evaluation of lidocaine 0.5% and lidocaine 0.25% with pethidine for intravenous regional anesthesia in upper limb soft tissue surgery
-
Design
-
The present clinical trial had a control group, with parallel groups, one-way blind, randomized, phase 2-3 on 50 patients. Sealedenveloped.com was used for randomization.
-
Settings and conduct
-
A person who is unaware of the type of study group is taking medication.
In both study groups, single syringes with the same medicinal volume of 40 cc and the same color will be used.
Profile of patients classified separately by the only person who has no involvement in the procedure information, not just the Physicians is uncertain.
Patients in the first intervention group will receive 3 mg / kg lidocaine 2% in 40 cc syringe for biers block.
Patients in the second intervention group will receive combination of 1.5 mg / kg lidocaine 2% and 1.5 mg / kg pethidine for biers block in 40 cc syringe.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion Criteria: 18 to 60 years old, Patients Candidate for Upper Limb Surgery ASA One and Two.
Exclusion Criteria:Heart disease ,High blood pressure and low blood pressure ,Bradycardia, Hyperthyroidism ,Cardiac block, Adrenoceptor agonist and antagonist , Peripheral neuropathy ,Pregnancy , Addiction , Allergy to the drugs used in the study, Coagulation Disorders ,Topical infections ,Patient refusal, Problems and deformities of musculoskeletal of the upper limb.
-
Intervention groups
-
Patients in the first intervention group will receive 3 mg / kg lidocaine 2% in 40 cc syringe for biers block.
Patients in the second intervention group will receive combination of 1.5 mg / kg lidocaine 2% and 1.5 mg / kg pethidine for biers block in 40 cc syringe.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Evaluation of the blocks of sensory nerves within the four main branches of the hand nerve, Evaluation of motor nerve block .