Comparing the Effectiveness of Three Methods of eye care in the prevention of keratitis disorders In patients (ICU)

Comparison of three methods of ophthalmology in prevention of keratitis in ICU patients

Triple blind with parallel groups

Study population and characteristics of the study. Patients admitted to ICU wards with lower consciousness level of 8. Less than 8) There is no history of eye problems in the patient's history. Patients undergoing ophthalmic examinations with blue light ophthalmoscopy and fluorescein testing will also be included when entering the ward if the cornea is healthy and without any other eye problems, as well as examination and examination of the patient's condition by the study physician. The patient will be placed in one of the eye care groups by simple random method (throwing dice). Place of Study: Shahid Sadoughi Hospital of Yazd Intensive Care Unit

Patients hospitalized in intensive care units Exclusion: Patients whose fluorescein test is positive at admission. Patients with trauma or injury. Entry requirements: Patients with decreased consciousness below 8. Connect to the ventilator. Impaired blink reflex.

The patient will be assigned to one of the eye care groups by simple random method (Roll of a die). In this case, the number (comparison of the eye ointment and the anti-allergic glue), ( the eye and artificial tears ), ( Comparison of Anti-Allergenic Tape and Artificial Tears) Each patient will receive two care modes such that one eye will receive simple eye ointment and the other one will receive anti-allergic glue, thereby confounding the effects. Each patient's eye will receive eye care for 6 hours and then receive simple eye care, including washing with distilled water and cotton.

ocular keratitis.

Simple randomization is used.Roll OF a die was used. So that the numbers 1 and 4 methods of eye ointment and anti-allergic adhesive, Numbers 2 and 5 Ophthalmic ointment and anti-allergic adhesive, Numbers 3 and 6 had anti-allergic adhesive and artificial tears. The randomization unit has also been individualized. Initially, any patient that entered the special ward ,examined by a specialist ICU physician and Inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated. If the patient met the inclusion criteria The patient was assigned to one of the treatment groups byrol of a die By a researcher . Then the eye care was done by another researcher and an eye examination was performed by an ophthalmologist.In order to conceal the throwing of the dice, it was done by the secretary who did not know the type of treatment in the groups, so that when the disease was accepted and approved by a special care specialist to attend the study, the secretary who was not part of the research team Throwing a dice determined which group the patient was in and informed the researcher It didn't happen random layers and random sequences.

The subjects in this study were comatose patients. So they were not aware of their eye care. The person doing the eye care was a researcher .But the eye examination was done by an ophthalmologist who was not aware of the type of eye care. In this way, before the start of the eye examination, the type of care was cleared from the patient's eye. And the one who did the data analysis It only had group numbers And the type of care provided in each group was not known.

All data can be published

6 months after printing the results

Specialists affiliated with medical universities

Nurses working in the intensive care unit

Efazljoo@gmail.com

Necessary information on the cause of the need for data information Documentation needed for data