-
Study aim
-
Comparison of safety and efficacy of buprenorphine maintenance treatment with methadone maintenance treatment in prison
-
Design
-
Double blind, parallel group, phase 3 randomized controlled trial
-
Settings and conduct
-
Patients in the addiction ward of Ghezal Hesar prison were randomly assigned to the intervention group (buprenorphine) and active control (methadone) based on the designed protocol, and the treatment results were compared over 24 weeks period.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion Criteria:
1- Diagnosis of moderate to severe opioid use disorder (opium, opium residue and heroin) based on DSM 5,
2- Continuous consumption of illegal opioids in the last period of consumption,
3- Age 18 to 50 years,
4- Conviction period more than 6 months,
5- To provide informed written consent.
Exclusion criteria:
1- Concurrent diagnosis of other substance use disorders (except tobacco),
2- Uncontrolled severe psychiatric disorder, including serious suicidality and psychosis based on physician's diagnosis,
3- Severe and uncontrolled physical diseases including unstable angina, high blood pressure, liver failure, and recent (last month) history of myocardial infarction based on a physician' s diagnosis and laboratory tests,
4- Pregnancy and lactation,
5- Inability to understand the study protocol or respond to assessments,
6- More than three times raise of liver enzymes.
-
Intervention groups
-
Intervention group: Patients are received flexible-dose buprenorphine treatment up to 24 mg/day (12 tablets) plus placebo syrup up to 22 units per day for 24 weeks.
Control group: Patients are received flexible-dose methadone treatment up to 110 mg/day (22 cc) plus sublingual placebo up to 12 units for 24 weeks.
All active and placebo medications are manufactured by Faran Shimi Pharmaceutical Company.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Proportion of weekly negative urine test for morphine