-
Study aim
-
Comparison of fixation and non-fixation of mesh in laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia
-
Design
-
Clinical trial, with parallel groups, two-way blind, randomized , About 100 patients who randomized by the blocking method and using online software www.sealedenvelope.com .
-
Settings and conduct
-
100 patients who are candidates for laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in Vali-e-Asr Hospital in Arak are divided into two groups. The study is double-blind and the intervention will be performed in the operating room while the patient is under general anesthesia and the patient and the outcome evaluator and data analyzer are not aware of the study groups. The first group will insert the mesh without fixing it in the peritoneum and the second group will insert the mesh by fixing it to the peritoneum. Then, after the surgery, the desired outcomes will be evaluated and compared in two groups.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Candidate for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery. exclusion criteria: liver, kidney, heart disease, history of drug use, chronic analgesia
-
Intervention groups
-
In the non-fixed mesh group, after surgery, the patient will have a fibrin mesh at the hernia site in the peritoneal wall and the two edges of the peritoneum will be fused at the surgical site, but the mesh will not be fused to the peritoneum. But in the second group, after surgery for the patient in the final stage, after placing a fibrin mesh at the site of the hernia in the peritoneal wall, in addition to the two edges of the peritoneum will be screwed on it at the surgical site, the mesh itself will be screwed to the peritoneum.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain, urinary retention, length of hospital stay