-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the outcome of uterine incision suture with the magon - babo technique (new technique) with the conventional method.
-
Design
-
In a randomized clinical trial with the parallel control group, double-blind; Phase 2-3, on 240 patients; randomization is performed by using block randomization
-
Settings and conduct
-
In this double-blind clinical trial parallel study, 240 patients who are candidates for cesarean section in Fatemieh Hospital in Hamadan will be included in the study. The researcher who measures and records the consequences and the patients are unaware of the type of intervention performed, so the study is conducted in a double-blinding.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Single pregnancy, Age between 18 and 45 years, Gestational age between 24 and 41 weeks, and history of previous cesarean section
Exclusion criteria: Multiple pregnancies, Diabetes, Chronic inflammatory diseases such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis
-
Intervention groups
-
New technique group: After a cesarean section, in patients with chromic suture round 1 of Supa company, the whole layer of the myometrium, the incision site is cut from one centimeter away, and the decidua part is swabbed in both upper and lower parts, and examined for nich lesions.
Conventional technique group:The uterus is sutured in two layers, the first layer is lacquered and the second layer is lacquered chrome 1 round without Supa company and are examined for nich lesions
-
Main outcome variables
-
Nich, residual myometrial thickness, Spotting, and Pelvic pain 6 & 9 months after cesarean section