-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the postoperative analgesia between the caudal and ilioinguinal/ iliohypogastric blocks in inguinal hernia repair surgery
-
Design
-
A double-blind, randomized clinical trial study with parallel groups and phases 3 on 60 patients. Randomization will be done with the block randomization method using Random allocation software.
-
Settings and conduct
-
This study will be conducted on children under inguinal hernia repair surgery in Urmia Shahid Motahhari hospital. In this double-blind study, the patient and the researcher will evaluate the outcomes and will be blinded to the allocation of patients into two blocks.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
In this study, 60 children undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery will be included. Inclusion criteria will be patients with physical status equal to or greater than two according to the criteria of the American Anesthesia Association (II>ASA), aged between 6 months and 5 years, and no having a spinal deformity. patients with coagulation problems such as hemophilia, DIC,
severe infections such as septicemia, meningitis, and brain tumors with increased intracranial pressure will be excluded.
-
Intervention groups
-
Both groups will be under general anesthesia with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, fentanyl 1 microgram/kg, lidocaine 1 mg/kg, and propofol 3 mg/kg. Then, in one group, the caudal block will be performed using a 22-gauge needle from the sacral hiatus space with 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.2% and 5 micrograms/kg of epinephrine at the lateral decubitus position. In the other group, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block will be performed with 0.1 cc/kg of bupivacaine 0.2% and epinephrine 5 micrograms/kg before surgery.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain score, prescription of an analgesic drug, and time of the first request for an analgesic drug