Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Palatal Pedicle Graft Technique in peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification in patients with implants in upper jaw
Tehran dental school, triple blind, palatal pedicle and free gingival graft.
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
1.Patients aging over 18.
2.Patients Should be healthy (no periodontal and systemic problem.)
3.Patients should have stable implants.
4.Patients should have adequate thickness of palate (2mm) for harvesting.
5.Patients with keratinized tissue width deficiency around implant.
Exclusion criteria:
1.Patient with history of radiotherapy and periodontitis.
2.Pregnant and patients smoking more than 10 cigarette each day.
3.Using any drugs which affects periodontal tissue or wound healing.
4.Patients with a history of soft tissue management in desired area.
Intervention groups
Intervention group:
In this group, the graft is harvested from the palate adjacent to the implant area and fixed in the vicinity of the implant.
Control Group:
In this group, the free gingival graft is harvested from the palate and fixed in the vicinity of the implant.
Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Palatal Pedicle Graft Technique in peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification in patients with implants in upper jaw
Public title
Evaluation of two techniques of free gingival graft and palatal pedicle graft in soft tissue around the implant.
Purpose
Treatment
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
1patinets age over 18 years old. 2.Healthy in systemic and periodontal condition. 3.patients with stable implants 4. patients with adequate thickness of palate for graft harvesting. 5.patients with keratinized tissue width deficiency.
Exclusion criteria:
patients with history of radiotherapy or periodontitis.2. pregnant women or patients with a history more than 10-cigarrete smoking per day.3.patients who are undertreatment of drugs affecting periodontal tissue and wound healing.4.patients with a history of soft tissue grafting in site of surgery
Age
From 18 years old
Gender
Both
Phase
3
Groups that have been masked
Participant
Investigator
Outcome assessor
Data analyser
Data and Safety Monitoring Board
Sample size
Target sample size:
34
Randomization (investigator's opinion)
Randomized
Randomization description
Individual randomization; Sealed envelope; The name of the surgical procedure is written on a sealed envelope and then on the day of surgery one of the envelopes is opened and the surgery is performed accordingly. Participants ,researchers and Data Safety Monitoring Board personals were blind to the study.
Blinding (investigator's opinion)
Triple blinded
Blinding description
The participants were blinded by the knowledge that they were participating in a research study, and the researcher and statistical analyzer are blind to the type of surgical technique performed for each patient.
Placebo
Not used
Assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Secondary Ids
empty
Ethics committees
1
Ethics committee
Name of ethics committee
Ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences