-
Study aim
-
Determining the effect of cathodal TDCS on the healthy side compared to anodal TDCS on the affected side of the motor cortex on spasticity of lower limb muscles, balance and quality of life of stroke patients
-
Design
-
RCT with parallel groups of random grouping in block method where 45 stroke patients are placed in three groups: cathodal, anodal and control.
-
Settings and conduct
-
this study will take place at Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences.
After randomization, 45 chronic stroke patients will be divided into three groups: cathodal, anodal, and control. First, the variables of the study will be evaluated in all subjects, and then all three groups will receive ten sessions of routine physiotherapy treatment. In addition to routine treatment, the cathodal and anodal groups received cathodal TDCS and anodal TDCS treatment, respectively. At the end of the tenth session and two weeks after that, all variables are evaluated again.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria:
Stroke patients 40 to 80 years old
At least 6 months have passed since the stroke
The minimum Ashworth score is 1.
Criteria for not entering the study:
History of epilepsy, cerebellar aneurysm, head injury
Metal implants in the brain
Widespread infection
Severe flaccid hemiplegia
Renal or hepatic impairment
Severe cognitive impairment
Stroke of both hemispheres
-
Intervention groups
-
cathodal group: 10 routine sessions of stroke physiotherapy+cathodal TDCS
anadol group: 10 routine sessions of stroke physiotherapy+ anodal TDCS
control group: 10 routine sessions of stroke physiotherapy
-
Main outcome variables
-
Spasticity of ankle plantar flexor muscles during active and passive ankle dorsiflexion, balance, quality of life before the first session, at the end of the tenth session and two weeks after the last treatment session