-
Study aim
-
Comparison of two bile duct cannulation methods in difficult ERCP cases with advertent or inadvertent pancreatic cannulation.
-
Design
-
Clinical trial with two parallel groups, double-blind and on 200 patients, trial phase is not applicable for this study. Randomization based on random blocks
-
Settings and conduct
-
ERCP candidate patients referred to Taleghani Hospital in Tehran, whose bile duct cannulation is difficult, are included in the study. One group is cannulated with fistulotomy over the pancreatic guidewire. The second group is cannulated with transpancreatic snephcterotomy technique. After the procedure, the patients will be evaluated in terms of complications and success rate of cannulation. The study is double-blind, so that the necessary information is provided to the patients regarding the study, it will be stated that there are two types of methods for their ERCP, but they will not know in which group and by which method they will undergo cannulation. Also, the data analyst does not know how to assign groups and results
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Patients with suspected acute biliary pancreatitis, biochemical findings, and ultrasound findings
Exclusion criteria: cardiopulmonary disease and other systemic diseases that endanger anesthesia
-
Intervention groups
-
In group 1, the bile duct will be cannulated with the fistulotomy over the PD guidewire. First, a stent will be placed in the duct of the pancreas. Then, the guidewire passes through the stent and enters the bile duct through the pancreas. In group 2, the bile duct will be cannulated with the trans pancreatic fistulotomy technique. the endoscopist enters the pancreas with a guide wire and enters the bile duct by creating a hole in the pancreas.
-
Main outcome variables
-
cannulation success rate; Complications include pancreatitis, perforation, bleeding