-
Study aim
-
Comparison between combined oral and topical 5-ASA versus topical 5-ASA for the treatment of ulcerative proctitis
-
Design
-
Clinical trial without control group, with parallel groups, triple-blinded, randomized, phase 2 on 64 patients. Block method was used for randomization.
-
Settings and conduct
-
In this study, all patients over 15 years of age referred to Amir al-Momenin Hospital in Arak with the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis in colonoscopy and histopathology and relevant tests are included in the study. The patients of the first group were given mesalazine suppositories, and the patients of the second group were given oral mesalazine along with mesalazine suppositories, and the patients were followed up for 6 months. Finally, laboratory criteria, severity of disease activity and response to treatment are examined in two groups.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: people over 15 years of age who have been diagnosed with ulcerative proctitis through colonoscopy and histology at Amirul Mominin Hospital in Arak during 1398-1402
Exclusion criteria: patients with sensitivity to salicylate, active peptic disease, proven coagulation problem, significant liver, kidney or heart disease, pregnant or lactating women, as well as patients whose previous treatment with 5-ASA has not been effective or undergoing maintenance treatment with compounds 5 -ASA.
-
Intervention groups
-
The first intervention group: patients treated with mesalazine suppositories at the rate of one gram per day for 6 months
The second intervention group: patients treated with oral mesalazine at the rate of 3 grams per day along with mesalazine suppositories of 1 gram per day for 6 months.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Severity of disease activity, response to treatment and laboratory criteria