The aim of this study is to compare the pain following single file root canal preparation by using Race , Neoniti and Mtwo files and two conventional method by using Race and Mtwo files. three In this double blind study, sixty three consented patients having the inclusion criteria will be randomly into three groups of 21 according to the type of tooth and their number of root canals. We will use minimization technique for randomization. After local anesthesia injection (Lidocaine with 1/80000 epinephrine,Daroupakhsh, Tehran, Iran), access cavities will be prepared and rubberdam isolation will be accomplished. Working length determination will be done by an electronic apex locator (Root ZX, J Morita, Tokyo, Japan) and confirmed by radiographic imaging. Root canal preparation will be accomplished by one of the following three instrumentation systems in a single file technique.
a. Neoniti A1 25.08 (Neolix, France)
b. RACE 25.06 (FKG Dentaire, La-Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerlan)
c. Mtwo 25.06 (Sweden and Martina, Padua, Italy)
5.25% sodium hypochloride will be used for irrigation during instrumentation. Afterwards the smear layer removal will be accomplished by 17%EDTA (Calasept, Nordiska Dental, Angelholm, Sweden) and 2% chlorhexidine liquid (Calasept, Nordiska Dental, Angelholm, Sweden) will be used as the final irrigant. Subsequently obturation will be done with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer using a lateral compaction technique. At the end of the first appointment a single dose of 400 mg Ibuprofen (Gelofen®, Jabberebne Hayyan, Tehran ,Iran) will be taken by the patient. Nine other capsules will also be provided to them. Postoperative pain levels will be recorded by a blind operator every 6h up to 7 days.