IRCT2014110413259N1 IRCT 2014-12-01 Vice chancellor for research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences evaluation of skin grafts harvested from wrist area versus groin area The Comparison of skin grafts harvested from wrist area versus groin area in patients with finger tip injury referring to Imam Reza Hospital during the year 2014 to 2015 2013-03-21 anticipated 72 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/13174 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Other design features: The patients will be randomized to a Wrist group or Groin group with a number allocated by Research Randomizer Program. 0 (exploratory trials) Injuries to the wrist and hand. Intervention 1: Skin grafts from wrist area (group1): We harvested the adjusted skin graft from the wrist area in elliptical form to incorporate to the size of the loss region in finger tips and tried to remove the subcutaneous fat completely to increase the odds of successful grafting. No meshing procedure were used, Grafts were fixed with absorbable 4.0 (Vicryl, Ethicon Inc, New Jersey) running sutures. Then dressing was applied on by 4-layered sterile gauze in a moderately tight fashion. and due to the low risk of hematoma formation the grafts were seen after 5-7days. Intervention 2: Skin grafts from groin area (group2): We harvested the adjusted skin graft from the groin area in elliptical form to incorporate to the size of the loss region in finger tips and tried to remove the subcutaneous fat completely to increase the odds of successful grafting. No meshing procedure were used, Grafts were fixed with absorbable 4.0 (Vicryl, Ethicon Inc, New Jersey) running sutures. Then dressing was applied on by 4-layered sterile gauze in a moderately tight fashion. and due to the low risk of hematoma formation the grafts were seen after 5-7days.