IRCT201206072982N10 IRCT 2015-09-04 Vice Chancellor for Research of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Comparison of Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy Comparison of Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Shariati hospital between 2012 to 2014: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study 2012-03-19 anticipated 40 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/2904 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment. 2-3 Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis. Intervention 1: In the MLC group, a 10- millimeter port was placed in the lower area of the navel, a 2.7- millimeter port was placed in the epigastric region, a 2.7-millimeter port was placed 2 centimeters below the ribs, and another 2.7- millimeter port was placed in the lower right side of the anterior axillary line. A 10- millimeter camera was sent in from the first port and the grasper holding the fundus of the gallbladder was sent in through the last port. The gallbladder was then taken out from the 10- millimeter port. After the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the patients underwent the recovery period of the operating room and were transferred to the ward. Paracetamol was used as the base pain reliever and was given to the patients for 48 hours, 1 gram every 8 hours. In case of severe pain, 25 grams of Pethidine was slowly injected into the vein. Intervention 2: In the SLIC Group: the main port was placed in the lower area of the navel, and the graspers and camera was entered through same port and cholecystectomy was performed. Then, the gallbladder was taken out from the navel location. The fascia and skin will be closed at the site of navel.