IRCT20131203015640N6 IRCT 2018-02-20 Tehran University of Medical Sciences Periosteal block vs. intravenous morphine on reducing the pain of patients with distal forearm fracture Comparison of the effect of periosteal block vs. intravenous morphine on reducing the pain of patients with distal radius and ulnar fracture 2018-02-15 anticipated 80 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/29421 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Supportive, Other design features: None, Randomization description: Simple randomization using table of random numbers, Blinding description: After entering the study, the patients are randomly divided into two groups and one group received intravenous morphine and local injection of placebo and the other group intravenous placebo and periosteal block. The procedure is carried out by a person who is unaware of the type of drugs and the assessment of pain is done by another person, who is also unaware of the groups. 2-3 Patients with closed distal forearm fracture. Intervention 1: Intervention group: To perform the periosteal block, using a 10cc syringe containing lidocaine 1% at a distance of 6-8 cm proximal to the wrist of the lateral of the radius bone and medial of the ulnar bone are injected. In this group, distilled water will be injected intravenously as placebo. Intervention 2: Control group: Morphine sulfate with a dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight and diluted in pre-prepared syringes with distilled water, so that each cc contains 1 mg of morphine. This amount will be infused slowly through the peripheral vein within 5 minutes. Block operations will also be performed using distilled water. No - There is not a plan to make this available Justification or reason for not sharing IPD is There is no further information