]>
IRCT20180607040001N1 IRCT 2018-10-21 Islamic Azad University Effect of cognitive behavioral group therapy in patients with chronic neuropathic pain The effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on pain coping strategies, perception, intensity and pain self-efficacy in patients with chronic neuropathic pain 2017-01-22 anticipated 30 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/33377 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Supportive, Other design features: Pain coping strategies were measured by pain coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ) (Rosenstiel and keefe, 1983) , pain perception was measured by pain beliefs and perception inventory (PBPI) (Williams and Thorn, 1989) , pain intensity was measured by west Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (Kerns et all, 1985) and pain self- efficacy was measured by pain self- efficacy questionnaire (Nicholas, 1989), Randomization description: In the first stage, a simple randomization was performed using a random numbers table, and the direction of reading numbers was assigned from right to left in the current study. The randomization unit was individual. In the second stage, the random allocation concealment was done using the sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) method. In the third stage, the random allocation process was implemented as well as to avoid the bias, it was necessary to choose a person other than the researchers who were involved in creating a randomized program in order, Blinding description: In the current study, the analyst and participants were not aware of any type of intervention in each group and it was a double-blind study. The participants were blind to their allocation, meaning that they were unaware of being in experimental and control groups until after the completion of the study. In addition, the outcome evaluator did not know the group of each patient or participant. N/A chronic neuropathic pain. Intervention 1: Intervention group: Intervention group experienced cognitive behavioural group therapy (CBGT) and did pretest, posttest and follow up. Intervention 2: Control group: cortrol group didn't have any therapy except medicine therapy. Control group did pretest, post-test and follow up. Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: - When: - To whom: Public Conditions: - Where to obtain: - How to obtain: - Comments: -
public Masoumeh Dehestani
No 96 , Edalat 2 alley , Baghban mahale st. , Modaress St. , Babol , Mazandaran
Babol Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0000000000 +98 11 3222 9146 ddehestanim@gmail.com Islamic Azad University scientific Bahram Mirzaian
Psychotherapy and consultation center of Bamdad, peyvandi street
Sari Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0000000000 +98 11 3325 9528 bahrammirzaian@gmail.com Islamic Azad University Iran (Islamic Republic of) Participants who recognized chronic neuropathic pain by neurologist and don't have significant physical sickness. Whole participants are female. Age range of 20 to 60 years old. Inhabitant of Babol (from Babol). They haven't mental disorders. They have conscious satisfaction. They have education of high School and higher. They haven't participation in another instructional and therapeutic classes, simultaneously. 20 years 60 years Female The participants who are absent for over two sessions. The participants who are unwilling to participate in this study. The participants who suffer from mental disorders. The participants who are physically illness. Behavior Behavior Intervention group: Intervention group experienced cognitive behavioural group therapy (CBGT) and did pretest, posttest and follow up. Control group: cortrol group didn't have any therapy except medicine therapy. Control group did pretest, post-test and follow up. Pain coping strategies, pain perception, pain intensity, pain self-efficacy. Timepoint: Two weeks before intervention. Method of measurement: Pain coping strategies were measured by pain coping strategies auestionnaire (CSQ) (Rosenstiel and keefe, 1983) , pain perception was measured by pain beliefs and perception inventory (PBPI) (Williams and Thorn, 1989) , pain intensity was measured by west Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (Kerns et all, 1985) and pain self- efficacy was measured by pain self- efficacy questionnaire (Nicholas, 1989). Pain coping strategies, pain perception, pain intensity, pain self-efficacy. Timepoint: Two weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: En Pain coping strategies were measured by pain coping strategies auestionnaire (CSQ) (Rosenstiel and keefe, 1983) , pain perception was measured by pain beliefs and perception inventory (PBPI) (Williams and Thorn, 1989) , pain intensity was measured by west Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (Kerns et all, 1985) and pain self- efficacy was measured by pain self- efficacy questionnaire (Nicholas, 1989). Islamic Azad University Approved 2018-02-26 Ethics committee of Islamic Azad University Sari Branch Assistance of Medical, Islamic Azad University Sari Branch Sari Mazandaran Iran (Islamic Republic of)