]>
IRCT20190626044032N1 IRCT 2019-07-16 Tehran University of Medical Sciences The Effect of Using the Question Prompt List on Self-efficacy in Decision Making, Preferences in Participation and Shared Decision Making among People with Breast Cancer. The Effect of Using the Question Prompt List on Self-efficacy in Decision Making, Preferences in Participation and Shared Decision Making among People with Breast Cancer. 2019-07-23 anticipated 50 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/40492 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Education/Guidance, Randomization description: The random allocation will include three steps: Random sequence generation, allocation concealment and doing a random allocation process. Four random blocks are used to generate random sequences. Random sequence generation by block method will be done using Random Allocation Software. To ensure that random sequence is not predictable for the researcher who will perform the sampling, allocation concealment will be performed using numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. These two steps are taken by the supervisor and the student who performs the sampling will not be involved in these two phases, Blinding description: The data were coded and delivered to a statistician. N/A Breast cancer. Intervention 1: The intervention group received QPLs with questions about chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both, depending on what the patient needed. The time taken for QPL to make decisions was different in terms of the referral time of each patient and was measured as an auxiliary variable. The researcher responded to patient questions through a social network and followed them up. Patients met radiologist and shared their opinion with her and the final decision was made. Intervention 2: Control group: The control group benefited from routine care and did not receive any intervention to help making decision . Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: The outcomes and basic characteristics of the participants will be shared after being unidentified. When: Data will be released when the results are published. To whom: All people will have access to published data. Conditions: Data can be used for people who intend to write systematic review and meta-analysis. Where to obtain: To receive the data, you can send an email to the following address: zy.nurse@gmail.com How to obtain: After reviewing the request, the data will be sent by email. Comments:
public Zahra Yazdani
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nosrat St., Tohid Sq., Tehran, Iran
Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1419733171 +98 21 6642 1685 zy.nurse@gmail.com Tehran University of Medical Sciences scientific Reza Negarandeh
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nosrat St., Tohid Sq., Tehran, Iran.
Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of) 1419733171 +98 21 6642 1685 negarandeh@gmail.com Tehran University of Medical Sciences Iran (Islamic Republic of) able to read and write Persian patients with breast cancer who were referred for adjuvant/ neoadjuvant treatment following tumor resection age 18 years or older knowing their diagnosis of breast cancer 18 years no limit Female a history of psychiatric illness that would prevent them from participating in treatment decision-making, metastatic breast cancer, reluctance to participate in research C50 Malignant neoplasm of breast Other N/A The intervention group received QPLs with questions about chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both, depending on what the patient needed. The time taken for QPL to make decisions was different in terms of the referral time of each patient and was measured as an auxiliary variable. The researcher responded to patient questions through a social network and followed them up. Patients met radiologist and shared their opinion with her and the final decision was made. Control group: The control group benefited from routine care and did not receive any intervention to help making decision . Shared decision making. Timepoint: After intervention. Method of measurement: The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire. Self-efficacy in Decision Making. Timepoint: Before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Decision Self-efficacy Scale. Preferences in Participation. Timepoint: Before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Control Preferences Scale. Tehran University of Medical Sciences Approved 2019-06-26 Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Sixth floor, Central Office of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Corner of Quds St, Keshavarz Blvd Tehran Tehran Iran (Islamic Republic of)