]>
IRCT20181114041651N2 IRCT 2022-11-05 Shiraz University of Medical Sciences piezosurgery vs. conventional rotary in wisdom tooth surgery. Evaluation of post-extraction complications of mandibular impacted third molar with piezosurgery vs. conventional rotary method. 2019-07-24 anticipated 30 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/43545 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: There is a pocket which there are 15 pieces of paper with letter A (for conventional rotary method) and 15 pieces with letter B (for piezosurgery method) in it. For each patient, one piece of paper will be token that determine the method which is used to remove right side wisdom tooth. After a week, the other side (left) wisdom tooth will be removed by the other method, Blinding description: The patient doesn't know that his/her tooth removed by which method. The student colleague who assess the consequences doesn't know the method which is used to remove the tooth too. N/A Bilateral impacted mandibular wisdom tooth.. Intervention 1: Intervention group: piezosurgery:30 patients with bilateral mandibular impacted third molar will be selected.In 15 patients impacted third molar will be extracted on right side and in the others on left side by piezosurgery method. Intervention 2: Control group: rotary:30 patients with bilateral mandibular impacted third molar will be selected.In 15 patients impacted third molar will be extracted on right side and in the others on left side by rotary method. Undecided - It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make this available Justification or reason for indecision in sharing IPD is There are no more information.
public Ehsan Aliabadi
Qasrodasht St.
Shiraz Iran (Islamic Republic of) 15878-71956 +98 71 3626 3192 aliabadie@sums.ac.ir Shiraz University of Medical Sciences scientific Ehsan Aliabadi
Qasrodasht St.
Shiraz Iran (Islamic Republic of) 15878-71956 +98 71 3626 3192 aliabadie@sums.ac.ir Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Iran (Islamic Republic of) having bilateral impacted mandibular wisdom tooth age between 18 to 35 18 years 35 years Both Treatment - Surgery Treatment - Surgery Intervention group: piezosurgery:30 patients with bilateral mandibular impacted third molar will be selected.In 15 patients impacted third molar will be extracted on right side and in the others on left side by piezosurgery method Control group: rotary:30 patients with bilateral mandibular impacted third molar will be selected.In 15 patients impacted third molar will be extracted on right side and in the others on left side by rotary method. Time of procedure. Timepoint: during procedure. Method of measurement: With a smartphone chronometer, from the beginning of incision to the end of final suture. Trismus: mouth opening less than 20 mm. Timepoint: one, three, five and seven days after each surgery. Method of measurement: Using a tongue blade marked 20 mm distance, the incisal edge of the upper left central tooth to the incisal edge of the lower left central tooth is measured. The amount of pain after each operation. Timepoint: From day zero to sixth day after each operation. Method of measurement: By using of Visual Analogue Scale that patient give a score to his/her pain at home. Amount of face swelling. Timepoint: ‌Before the operation and on days one, three, five and seven after operation. Method of measurement: Using a flexible millimeter ruler, the distances between the mandibular angle and four points of the tragus, the lateral cantus of the eye, the anterior nasal spine, and the most prominent part of the chin (pogonion) are measured. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Approved 2019-07-23 Ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Vice-Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand Blvd. Shiraz Fars Iran (Islamic Republic of)