]>
IRCT20201031049201N1 IRCT 2020-11-12 Zahedan University of Medical Sciences Comparison of the effect of anesthetic injection in two ways on pain in patients after hemorrhoidectomy Comparison of post Operative analgesia with intraoperative administration of bupivacaine localy and intrersphincteric in hemorrhoidectomy operation 2020-11-15 anticipated 60 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/52185 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Prevention, Randomization description: In this study, simple randomization is used and the unit is individual randomization. In this way, with the help of STATA software, random codes are assigned to each patient in both intervention groups about the injection method and are recorded on a questionnaire, and the patient and the questioner are blind to avoid bias towards those codes, Blinding description: After obtaining the patient's informed consent, surgery is performed and the patient does not know about his anesthesia method during the operation. Also, after the operation and the patient entering the ward, the questioner does not know about the injection method and only completes the pain questionnaire. 2 Hemorrhoid. Intervention 1: Intervention group: All patients received 1 gram of antibiotic (keflin) before the operation and by the same method of general anesthesia, by receiving 5 cc per kg of preloaded fluid and then by injecting 1-2 micro grams per kilogram of fentanyl and 1-2 Mg per kg succinylcholine and 3-5 mg per kg Nestonal are anesthetized. Then, in the lithotomy position, one group underwent intra-sphincter injection of bupivacaine by Abu Reihan company in 4 positions (12, 3, 6, 9 and 9 o'clock). Intervention 2: Intervention group: The second intervention group underwent local bupivacaine injection at the site of lithotomy with a similar anesthesia method. Undecided - It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make this available Justification or reason for indecision in sharing IPD is There is no more information
public Seyed Sana Davoudi Moghadam
salamat Blvd, Khalij fars boulvard.Emam Ali Hospital
Zahedan Iran (Islamic Republic of) 9816743111 +98 54 3329 5770 sana.davoudi@zaums.ac.ir Zahedan University of Medical Sciences scientific Seyed Sana Davoudi Moghadam
salamat Blvd, Khalij fars boulvard.Emam Ali Hospital
Zahedan Iran (Islamic Republic of) 9816743111 +98 54 3329 5770 sana.davoudi@zaums.ac.ir Zahedan University of Medical Sciences Iran (Islamic Republic of) People between the ages of 20 and 70 People who met the ASA criteria (anesthesia class)in class I and II 20 years 70 years Both People with a history of drug addiction People with a history of any heart, liver, kidney, neurological disease Allergies to any medication Inability to determine the use of verbal pain scale (such as people with mental disabilities) Dissatisfaction with participation in the study K64.8 Other hemorrhoids Prevention Prevention Intervention group: All patients received 1 gram of antibiotic (keflin) before the operation and by the same method of general anesthesia, by receiving 5 cc per kg of preloaded fluid and then by injecting 1-2 micro grams per kilogram of fentanyl and 1-2 Mg per kg succinylcholine and 3-5 mg per kg Nestonal are anesthetized. Then, in the lithotomy position, one group underwent intra-sphincter injection of bupivacaine by Abu Reihan company in 4 positions (12, 3, 6, 9 and 9 o'clock). Intervention group: The second intervention group underwent local bupivacaine injection at the site of lithotomy with a similar anesthesia method. Pain status after hemorrhoidectomy in both groups. Timepoint: Evaluation of pain status in both groups 6 and 12 hours after surgery. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale for patient that is measured by the patient from 0 to 10. Zahedan University of Medical Sciences Approved 2020-01-05 Ethics committee of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences Zahedan, Dr hesabi Square, Pardis of medical sciences Zahedan Sistan-va-Balouchestan Iran (Islamic Republic of)