]>
IRCT20200825048515N44 IRCT 2021-10-06 Esfahan University of Medical Sciences Comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus Glidescope for the purpose of laryngoscopy management and intubation in candidates of caesarean delivery Comparative evaluation direct laryngoscopy versus Glidescope for the purpose of laryngoscopy management and intubation in candidates of caesarean delivery with general anesthesia 2021-04-21 anticipated 90 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/59052 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: In this study, 90 eligible patients will be randomly selected. Then random numbers are created by computer software "Random Allocation". These numbers are randomly divided into two groups A (first intervention) and B (second intervention). Each number is written on paper and placed in an envelope. Then each patient is asked to choose an envelope from among the envelopes. According to the selected envelope, the patient will be assigned to one of the two groups, Blinding description: To meet the blinding condition in the study, the anesthesiologist that was responsible for performing intubation did not take part in the collection of patients’ information due to knowledge of the type of intervention in each of the two groups; however, the patient, the patient data collector, and the statistician were not aware of the type of intervention in two groups. N/A Elective cesarean section. Intervention 1: The first intervention group: Patients in the first group underwent intubation using the direct Macintosh laryngoscope with Macintosh blade No. 3. Intervention 2: The second intervention group: Patients in the second group underwent intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscope. No - There is not a plan to make this available Justification or reason for not sharing IPD is y. If you do not not want to provide more explanation please enter "There is no further information
public Azim Honarmand
Anesthesiology Department, Al-Zahra Hospita, Sefeh Blvd., Tohid Street
Isfahan Iran (Islamic Republic of) 8174675731 +98 31 3620 2020 honarmand@med.mui.a.ir Esfahan University of Medical Sciences scientific Azim Honarmand
Anesthesiology Department, Al-Zahra Hospita, Sefeh Blvd., Tohid Street
Isfahan Iran (Islamic Republic of) 8174675731 +98 31 3620 2020 honarmand@med.mui.a.ir Esfahan University of Medical Sciences Iran (Islamic Republic of) Pregnant women that were candidates for cesarean section under general anesthesia Class I and II classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists The gravidity of one or two Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score of equal or less than 5 no limit no limit Female The thyromental distance (TMD) was less than 6 cm The neck circumference (NC) was equal or more than 43 cm Patients with an increased intracranial pressure Any airway pathology Any cervical spinal cord injury requirement for rapid induction O82.0 Delivery by elective caesarean section Treatment - Devices Treatment - Devices The first intervention group: Patients in the first group underwent intubation using the direct Macintosh laryngoscope with Macintosh blade No. 3. The second intervention group: Patients in the second group underwent intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscope. Number of attempts for intubatio. Timepoint: At the time of intubation. Method of measurement: Number of attempts. Time-to-intubation. Timepoint: At the time of intubation. Method of measurement: from the time the laryngoscope was inserted into the mouth to the filling of the endotracheal tube cuff and the confirmation of the insertion of the intubation with capnography. Systolic blood pressure. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device. Diastolic blood pressure. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device. Mean Arterial Pressure. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device. Heart rate. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study (baseline) and before laryngoscopy and in the first, third, fifth, and tenth minutes after laryngoscopy. Method of measurement: Monitoring device. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Approved 2019-03-02 Ethics committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Street address Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezar Jarib Ave., Azadi Sq Isfahan Isfehan Iran (Islamic Republic of)