]>
IRCT20230530058343N1 IRCT 2023-07-09 The University of Faisalabad Comparing Mulligan and Maitland Mobilization Techniques for Chronic Non-SpecificLow Back Pain Patients RCT Comparative effects of Mulligan and Maitland Mobilization Techniques in chronic Non- Specific Low Back Pain patients. 2020-12-24 anticipated 40 Complete https://irct.ir/trial/70957 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Diagnostic, Randomization description: A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial was conducted for treatment and the unit of randomization through individual. Purposive sampling Technique was used to collect sample and two groups will randomly allocated by lottery method. Total 44 patients was assessed for eligibility criteria, 2 excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria and 1 refused to participate. then Randamization is done and allocated into two groups Mulligan group and Maitland Group. The Mulligan group has total 21 participant from 21 participant 1 is exclude for not following the treatment session . and the Maitland group has 20 participants. Both groups results has been analyzed through spss version, Blinding description: The participants in both Mulligan group and Maitland group are blinded from treatment after giving informed consent. 1-2 Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Intervention group: Mulligan Group. Yes - There is a plan to make this available What will be shared: Comparative effects of Mulligan and Maitland Mobilization Techniques in chronic Non- Specific Low Back Pain patients. When: not sure To whom: The University of Faisalabad Conditions: For Research Purpose Where to obtain: website and Email How to obtain: not sure Comments: Please comment them when you study the article.
public hafiza Mubashra Zahid, Maryam Safdar
near manawala road
faisalabad Pakistan 817185 +92 41 8750971 studentaffairsew@tuf.edu.pk The University of Faisalabad scientific Hafiza Mubashra Zahid
near manawala road
Faisalabad Pakistan 38000 +92 41 87509715 studentaffairsew@tuf.edu.pk The University of Faisalabad Pakistan Both gender (Male /Female) with the age 20-40. Patient having low back pain with duration of at least 4 months. At least moderate pain according to NPRS Minimum flexion of lumbar was 37±12° Minimum extension of lumbar was 14±4° Minimum kinesiophobia was 40±4. 20 years 40 years Both Vascular disease Diagnosed with systematic disease i.e. TB of spine Diagnosed with specific disease of LBP (arthritis, SIJ pain, and osteoporosis) Recent fracture or history of fracture Osteoporosis Pregnancy or C-section 6 months ago Previous hip or back surgery or fracture less than half year prior Abdominal surgery inside the past 90 days Treatment of existing back pain by another health care professional within one week Red flags i.e. tumor, infection, open wound (clinical signs of conceivable serious spinal or foundational messes) Diagnosed with neurological disease or radiculopathy Patient who do not receive any PT/ exercise plan from previous 3 months Refusal for consent. M54.5 Low back pain Treatment - Other Intervention group: Mulligan Group 1-Pain 2-Range of Motion. Timepoint: 1-Pain intensity = Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). 2-Lumbar Range of Motion = Measuring tape 3-. Method of measurement: 1-Pain intensity = Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). On a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), patients were approached to check the number somewhere in the range of 0 and 10, 0 and 20 or 0 and 100 that best matches their aggravation power. Zero as a rule addresses 'no aggravation' and as far as possible addresses 'most exceedingly terrible conceivable torment' 2-Lumbar Range of Motion = Measuring tape One of the most common tape measurement procedures used to measure lumbar flexion involves a technique pioneered by Schubert, who described the original two- point method for measuring spinal flexion and later modified it to measure spinal flexion. This makes one mark at the lumbosacral. Junction and the second mark are made 10 cm above the first mark, with the subject in a neutral position with the spine. After the stationary subject bends forward as far as possible, the amount of flexion in the spine is estimated by increasing the distance between the first and second points. Because the tape measure method relies on the stretching or distraction of the skin over the spine, this technique (and modifications of the technique) is sometimes called the skin distraction method. Bone landmarks for tape measure indicate ROM of lumbar extension, midline of spine consistent with PSIS, cm above baseline marker. Kinesiophobia. Timepoint: kinesiophobia= Tampa Scale. Method of measurement: The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia has a complete score scope of 17-68, with 17 showing no kinesiophobia, 68 demonstrating extreme kinesiophobia, and a score of ±37 showing the presence of kinesiophobia. The contracted variant keeps up with things 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 15 and 17 from the first TSK- 11 scale and has a score scope of 11-44. https://pjmhsonline.com/index.php/pjmhs/article/view/2222 RCT https://www.thehealerjournal.com/index.php/templates/article/view/83 RCT investigator initiated trail Approved 2020-12-24 Ethics Comittee of The University of Faisalabad Near to manawala road, Faisalabad Faisalabad Punjab Pakistan