IRCT20260530069575N1 IRCT 2026-06-02 Bagheiat-allah University of Medical Sciences Comparison of Tonsillectomy Outcomes Using LigaSure Device-Assisted Technique Versus Conventional Method Comparison of Tonsillectomy Outcomes Using LigaSure Device-Assisted Technique Versus Conventional Method 2026-07-23 anticipated 60 Pending https://irct.ir/trial/90486 interventional Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: Random allocation will be performed using the random blocking method (four-block blocks). The possible blocks are as follows: 1- AABB, 2- ABAB, 3- BABA, 4- BBAA, 5- BAAB, 6- ABBA. At this stage, numbers (1 to 6) will be randomly selected using a random number table, and this process will be repeated 15 times until the sample size is reached, Blinding description: Patients do not know which group they have been assigned to, but they were informed about both methods beforehand and entered the study with full consent. Since they are under anesthesia, they are unaware of how their surgery was performed. Additionally, the outcome assessor and the data analyst are blinded to the study hypothesis. 3 Tonsillectomy. Intervention 1: Intervention group: onsillectomy surgery is performed using LigaSure. LigaSure is a new electrosurgical hemostatic device consisting of an electrosurgical generator, a handpiece with a forceps‑like scissor mechanism, along with a manual or foot switch. Intervention 2: Control group: Tonsillectomy is performed using cold dissection. In this method, the tonsil and its capsule are separated from the surrounding tissues using a dissector, detached from the lower pole, and the tonsil is removed. Hemostasis is achieved using 3/0 Vicryl suture. No - There is not a plan to make this available Justification or reason for not sharing IPD is Due to patient confidentiality and privacy considerations, we have not received permission from the ethics committee to share individual patient data