Protocol summary
-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the efficacy of evidence-based education and routine cardiopulmonary resuscitation workshop on clinical competencies among emergency nurses
-
Design
-
This is a two group single blind clinical trial which is based on routine training.
-
Settings and conduct
-
The present study was a semi-experimental interventional study on nurses working in Emergency wards of Imam Khomeini hospital in Dehdasht in 1396.
After selecting eligible people, the subjects were randomly assigned into two groups. In the first group, evidence-based education program including cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation training and in the second group, only rehabilitation training were given through a routine workshop. The second group didn't receive any training about evidence-based learning
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria:
Nurses in Emergency Department of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Dehdasht Hospital with a minimum of 2 years work experience
Failure to complete an educational course related to an evidence-based workshop or the like
Participating in the CPR Team
The willingness to participate in the study and signing the written informed
consent of the company in the study.
Non Inclusion criteria:
Not participating in the CPR team; Participate in evidence-based workshop meetings over one meeting.
-
Intervention groups
-
The study is a two-step intervention group based on evidence-based training and routine workshops. Both groups received the same training in their own fields and did not know the contents of the other group.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Clinical Competency
General information
-
Reason for update
-
-
Acronym
-
-
IRCT registration information
-
IRCT registration number:
IRCT20180221038820N1
Registration date:
2018-09-04, 1397/06/13
Registration timing:
retrospective
Last update:
2018-10-02, 1397/07/10
Update count:
1
-
Registration date
-
2018-09-04, 1397/06/13
-
Registrant information
-
-
Recruitment status
-
Recruitment complete
-
Funding source
-
-
Expected recruitment start date
-
2018-02-04, 1396/11/15
-
Expected recruitment end date
-
2018-02-09, 1396/11/20
-
Actual recruitment start date
-
2018-02-10, 1396/11/21
-
Actual recruitment end date
-
2018-02-11, 1396/11/22
-
Trial completion date
-
2018-06-17, 1397/03/27
-
Scientific title
-
A comparative study on the effects of two evidence based teaching method and routine workshop in cardiopulmonary resuscitation on clinical competency of nurses in emergency department
-
Public title
-
Clinical competency clinical trial
-
Purpose
-
Health service research
-
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria:
Nurses working at the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Hospital, with at least two years of work experience
not participatin in the training courses associated with the evidence - based workshop or similar cases
Having a contribution to the CPR team
The willingness to participate in the study and to signing the written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria:
Not participating in the CPR team
Participate in evidence-based workshop meetings over one meeting
-
Age
-
From 25 years old to 50 years old
-
Gender
-
Both
-
Phase
-
N/A
-
Groups that have been masked
-
- Participant
- Care provider
- Data analyser
- Data and Safety Monitoring Board
-
Sample size
-
Target sample size:
44
Actual sample size reached:
44
-
Randomization (investigator's opinion)
-
Randomized
-
Randomization description
-
The randomization of this study has been done using "shuffling sheets" or cards to obtain more reliable results. In this method, the number of people in the charter community was placed in a box with the characteristics of the participants and randomly and on the card People were divided into two different groups
-
Blinding (investigator's opinion)
-
Single blinded
-
Blinding description
-
In this study , the first group will receive evidence - based training and the second group will train a workshop and do not know the trained material, and the participants are registered on the model and during the rehabilitation by a checklist trained by the supervisor.
-
Placebo
-
Not used
-
Assignment
-
Parallel
-
Other design features
-
Ethics committees
1
-
Ethics committee
-
-
Approval date
-
2018-02-03, 1396/11/14
-
Ethics committee reference number
-
IR.AJUMS.RES.1396.959
Health conditions studied
1
-
Description of health condition studied
-
Cardiac and pulmonary resuscitation
-
ICD-10 code
-
-
ICD-10 code description
-
Primary outcomes
1
-
Description
-
Clinical Nurses' Competency Regarding Cardiac and Pulmonary Restorations
-
Timepoint
-
2 mounth
-
Method of measurement
-
questionnaire
Intervention groups
1
-
Description
-
The intervention group 1: Learning to recover from the cpr by evidence-based learning method. In the first group, evidence-based learning included: two workshops of research methodology for 4 sessions with the contents of an introduction to evidence-based nursing, how to set clinical questions, how to use it Information sources and how articles are criticized. Following the implementation of the evidence-based evidence-based care workshop on cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and in line with the latest changes to the 2015 revival of 2015, nurses will be familiarized with evidence-based care and appropriate for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During the two months of each week, we will take an hour to troubleshoot and track the learners' experiences. Two months after the intervention, their clinical competence was assessed using a researcher-made clinical eligibility checklist.
-
Category
-
Behavior
2
-
Description
-
Intervention group 2: This group was trained by two trained personnel in a hospital in the course of two 3-hour recurrent training workshops through Slide and PowerPoint, and the film was updated with the 2015 WayLead, and began training in groups for training they have payed.
-
Category
-
Behavior
1
-
Sponsor
-
-
Grant name
-
-
Grant code / Reference number
-
-
Is the source of funding the same sponsor organization/entity?
-
Yes
-
Title of funding source
-
Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences
-
Proportion provided by this source
-
100
-
Public or private sector
-
Public
-
Domestic or foreign origin
-
Domestic
-
Category of foreign source of funding
-
empty
-
Country of origin
-
-
Type of organization providing the funding
-
Academic
Sharing plan
-
Deidentified Individual Participant Data Set (IPD)
-
No - There is not a plan to make this available
-
Justification/reason for indecision/not sharing IPD
-
-
Study Protocol
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Statistical Analysis Plan
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Informed Consent Form
-
Undecided - It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make this available
-
Clinical Study Report
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Analytic Code
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Data Dictionary
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Title and more details about the data/document
-
-
When the data will become available and for how long
-
-
To whom data/document is available
-
-
Under which criteria data/document could be used
-
-
From where data/document is obtainable
-
-
What processes are involved for a request to access data/document
-
-
Comments
-