Evaluation and Comparison of Two Methods of Speech and Simulation Training in Internet Training in Advanced Trauma Life Support Guidelines
Design
Random allocation method was used to randomly allocate lecture and simulation to online groups using Random Allocation software.In both lecture and simulation training methods, students were pre-tested using the Awareness Questionnaire before completing the training, and again after completing the training, both methods were again tested.
Settings and conduct
This study was a single blind clinical trial on medical interns introduced to the Emergency Department of Imam Hossein Hospital in Shahrood in 1977.
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Medical interns studying at Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Desire and Satisfaction for Inclusion.
Anyone who was absent from the study for a variety of reasons, including illness at the workplace or in the study process or unwilling to continue in the training process, was excluded.
Intervention groups
The study was randomly divided into two groups of 28. The intervention group was evaluated by simulation method and the control group was evaluated by trauma lecture using ATLS guide line.
Main outcome variables
Comparison of trauma awareness score using ATLS guide line in two lecture and simulation training groups
General information
Reason for update
Acronym
IRCT registration information
IRCT registration number:IRCT20191101045299N1
Registration date:2019-11-06, 1398/08/15
Registration timing:retrospective
Last update:2019-11-06, 1398/08/15
Update count:0
Registration date
2019-11-06, 1398/08/15
Registrant information
Name
maryam Abaszadeh
Name of organization / entity
Country
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Phone
+98 23 3234 2000
Email address
abbaszade@shmu.ac.ir
Recruitment status
Recruitment complete
Funding source
Expected recruitment start date
2018-05-22, 1397/03/01
Expected recruitment end date
2019-01-21, 1397/11/01
Actual recruitment start date
2018-06-05, 1397/03/15
Actual recruitment end date
2019-03-06, 1397/12/15
Trial completion date
2019-03-06, 1397/12/15
Scientific title
Comparison two training methods of lecture and simulation in the training of interns in adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)
Public title
Comparison two training methods of lecture and simulation in the training of interns
Purpose
Education/Guidance
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Studied at Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
Desire and Satisfaction for Inclusion
Exclusion criteria:
Not all people who were absent from the workplace or in the process for a variety of reasons, including illness
Unwillingness to participate in the training process
Age
No age limit
Gender
Both
Phase
N/A
Groups that have been masked
Data analyser
Sample size
Target sample size:
56
Actual sample size reached:
56
Randomization (investigator's opinion)
Randomized
Randomization description
Random Allocation software was used to randomly assign lecture and simulation to online groups. Random Allocation software was used. Medical interns were divided randomly into two groups of 28 people
Blinding (investigator's opinion)
Single blinded
Blinding description
The statistical analyst was unaware of the defined codes for training methods in random allocation.
Placebo
Not used
Assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Secondary Ids
empty
Ethics committees
1
Ethics committee
Name of ethics committee
Ethics Committee of Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
score using ATLS guide line in two lecture and simulation training groups
ICD-10 code
ICD-10 code description
Primary outcomes
1
Description
Trauma Awareness Score Using the ATLS Guideline
Timepoint
One month course
Method of measurement
Questionnaire
Secondary outcomes
empty
Intervention groups
1
Description
Intervention group: The training was done by simulation method.In the simulated method, all the topics were presented as lectures and then all the steps on the collage were taught in a practical manner similar to the actual situation.
Category
Other
2
Description
Control group: Teaching was done using the lecture method.Lessons were delivered internally through lectures or using PowerPoint. Other methods such as instructional videos or practical exercises were not used.