The effect of Corrective Approach on Hyper Kyphosis, Forward Head Posture Correction, Increased Postural Sways and Respiratory Function of Students

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two NASM and Sahreman Approaches on Modification of Hyperkyphosis, Front Rupture and Increased Postural Fluctuation in Male Students of Razi University

Randomized control trial- two parallel groups-three blinded

The study will be conducted at the Razi University Sports Rehabilitation Laboratory In this randomized, three-blind randomized trial, 30 male students who participated in physical examinations of the University Health Center who had kyphosis with headache were randomly assigned to two NASM training groups (Random number generator). N = 15 and the Sahrmann approach training group (n = 15). In the pre-test and post-test phase, out-come measures will be assessed.

18-22 years, kyphosis > 45 ° and forward head > 49 °, no spinal fracture, no bone and joint disease. Exclusion criteria included another regular training participating, physical disabilities, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, balance problems, and neuromuscular disorders.

Group 1: Eight weeks, three sessions per week, and one hour of NASM approach training, will be executed: First, we perform the inhibitory exercises and then the stretching exercises on the shortened and tightness muscles. Then, during the activation phase: we strengthen the weak and elongated muscles, and finally perform the integrated exercises. Group 2 Sahrmann: Strength training will be performed in the form of 70% to 80% of subjects' cognitive ability and based on the Borg Exercise Intensity scale of 10-12.

the kyphosis angle will be measured by a spinal mouse, the head angle will be measured by Autocad software, and the evaluation of foot pressure and postural sways by the PT-Scann device. and respiratory function will be measured by spirometer.

To allocate participants to the research groups, a computerized list of random numbers was assigned to randomly assign the subjects to individual blocks (2, 4, 6, 8) using SPSS software. Participants are then assigned by a research team member who is not involved with the 1: 1 allocation ratio in the training groups.

The allocation sequence is concealed by opaque envelopes numbered sequentially, and letter envelopes are opened only after all initial and baseline assessments of the participants have been completed. The random allocation sequence is performed by a study contributor who is not involved in the evaluations and remains hidden from the evaluators and other research partners. Due to the nature of the study evaluator is blinded to the division of participants into groups, participants and the statistical expert and evaluator are also blinded to the division of participants into groups.

there aren't furthers information