-
Study aim
-
The present study aims to address the question of whether six weeks of Pilates exercises, corrective exercises, and Alexander's Technique can have different effects on UCS in 13 to 16-year-old teenage girls. Which exercises are more effective?
-
Design
-
Clinical trial with three intervention groups, with parallel groups, single-blind, randomized, phase 1 on 45 students.
-
Settings and conduct
-
The samples were trained in the Corrective Exercise Clinic of the Education and Training Administration of Quchan. Each session lasted one hour, three sessions per week, and for a duration of six weeks. The samples were not aware of which exercise group they were in or which exercises they were performing, to assess the effect on their UCS (they were blinded). The examiner was fully aware of the exercise protocol (not blinded). Each exercise session for the different groups would begin with a 10-minute warm-up and end with a 5-minute cool-down. The remaining time would be allocated to the specific exercises of each group (Corrective Exercise group, Pilates group, and Alexander Technique group).
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
In order to be included in the study, participants had to have postural abnormalities such as kyphosis, FH, and RS simultaneously and express a willingness to participate. Observing any pathological symptoms, history of fractures, surgeries, joint diseases, and injuries in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine region, skeletal-muscular imbalances, lower limb cross syndrome, having BMI outside the normal range, and having regular physical activity of at least 6 hours per week were considered as exclusion criteria from the study.
-
Intervention groups
-
Pilates exercises(N=15), corrective exercises (N=15), and Alexander's Technique (N=15).
-
Main outcome variables
-
Upper cross syndrome