-
Study aim
-
Determining the difference in the effectiveness of self-directed learning strategies training and executive function enhancement training on academic optimism, sense of belonging to school, and academic help-seeking in students with low academic achievement
-
Design
-
The clinical trial has a control group with parallel groups, double-blind, selected by purposive randomization, and with a sample size of 45 people, they are placed in three groups of 15 people by simple randomization.
-
Settings and conduct
-
This study will use a field experimental research method and an extensive pre-test and post-test design with a follow-up phase. All participants, clinical caregivers, and evaluators who interpret the data will be kept confidential and all participants will be given pseudonyms.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
-Study subjects: Students with low academic achievement.
-Age range: 15.
-No concurrent clinical disorders and no dependence on alcohol or drugs.
-Participate in the study with informed consent.
-People who have a history of physical problems that could interfere with the research process.
-No concurrent clinical disorders and no dependence on alcohol or drugs.
-
Intervention groups
-
Self-directed learning strategies: In this method, learners will develop greater speed and accuracy in learning, developmental issues such as greater self-confidence, and greater responsibility will also be created in learners. Executive Function Enhancement Training: The goal of this therapy is to help individuals adjust and adapt cognitive performance in the areas of attention and concentration and many other cognitive processes.
-
Main outcome variables
-
teaching self- regulated learning strategies, teaching empowerment executive functions, academic optimism, sense of belonging to school, academic help seeking, students