-
Study aim
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Unified Protocol with and without Supplementary Protocol on Personality Dimensions and Symptoms in Patients with Emotional Disorders and Identifying Mechanisms of Change.
-
Design
-
This is a mixed-methods study. The quantitative phase uses a pretest–posttest design with two experimental groups and purposive non-random sampling. Twenty patients with emotional disorders will be randomly assigned to two groups. Each group will complete pretest, midtest, posttest, and two-month follow-up. The qualitative phase involves inductive latent content analysis to identify change mechanisms after treatment.
-
Settings and conduct
-
Participants: Patients with emotional disorders recruited from university-affiliated clinics and hospitals. Screening via interview and eligibility assessment; informed consent obtained; questionnaires administered at three time points; interventions delivered based on random assignment; 16 individual therapy sessions provided.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion: Age 25–45 years, at least high school diploma, medication stability for ≥6 weeks.
Exclusion: Medication changes, psychotic disorders, personality disorders, concurrent treatments, suicide risk, substance use, recent psychotherapy.
-
Intervention groups
-
Unified Protocol: A transdiagnostic CBT-based intervention targeting negative emotion regulation.
Complementary Module: An additional intervention focusing on positive emotion regulation.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Integrating personality dimensions into transdiagnostic CBT may simplify care, reduce therapist training burden, enhance treatment efficiency, align with real-world clinical presentations, enable simultaneous intervention for primary disorders and comorbidities, facilitate mechanism-based development of interventions, and support preventive efforts and early identification of at-risk individuals.