-
Study aim
-
Clinical comparison of two submental intubation methods (Altmeyer and Seldinger) in patients candidates for fixation of maxillofacial injuries
-
Design
-
This clinical trial study was a parallel-group, single-blind, randomized study on 22 patients. The rand function of Excel software was used for randomization.
-
Settings and conduct
-
This clinical trial study will be conducted on 22 patients who are candidates for fixation of maxillofacial injuries referred to Shahid Rahmanun Hospital in 2025. The outcome assessors, caregivers, and data analysts will not be aware of the grouping of the samples and the type of surgery performed.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Patients who were candidates for fixation of maxillofacial injuries and submental intubation under general anesthesia were included in the study.
Patients with traumatic brain injury, coagulopathy, psychiatric diseases, polytrauma and requiring long-term respiratory support will be excluded from the study.
-
Intervention groups
-
Intervention group 1: an incision is made in the paramedian area under the jaw. Using arterial forceps, a blunt tunnel is created towards the floor of the mouth and after suction, the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff is evacuated and removed from the tunnel. Then the ETT is separated from the circuit, passed through the tunnel with the help of forceps and connected in the new location.
Intervention group 2: In this method, a tracheostomy kit is used. The needle with the sheath is inserted into the submental area and after appearing in the mouth, the guide wire is inserted and the path is widened. After creating the path, a similar process is performed as in the first group, including evacuation and passage of the cuff and ETT through the submental tunnel and finally, the tube is connected to the respiratory circuit.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Bleeding, duration of intubation, skin scar