-
Study aim
-
Comparing the effectiveness of mindfulness training and metacognitive strategies on academic boredom, rumination, academic self-handicapping, and hope for education in procrastinating male students in junior secondary schools.
-
Design
-
Clinical trials with a control group, with parallel groups, are single-blind, selected by purposive randomization, and then, through simple randomization by drawing lots, the 45 people who were selected are placed into two experimental groups and a control group.
-
Settings and conduct
-
This study will use a field experimental research method with an extensive pre-test and post-test design with a follow-up phase. The assessors and data analysts will be blinded, and all information will be kept confidential to avoid bias.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Male students of junior high school who are procrastinators
Declaration of consent from the subject and their parents to participate in the research
Failure of the subject to participate in other educational or therapeutic interventions at the same time
Suffering from any significant psychological illness (such as personality disorder, major depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, etc.) based on clinical interview and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition).
-
Intervention groups
-
Mindfulness is a technique that, combined with meditation and specific mental orientations to an experience, encourages non-judgmental awareness of the present moment by minimizing involvement in thoughts and feelings. Whereas the metacognitive training program assumes that vulnerable individuals engage in worry and ruminative thinking about the functioning of underlying beliefs and metacognitions. No intervention is provided for the control group.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Academic boredom, rumination, academic self-handicapping, and hope for education