-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the effect of topical diltiazem and botox injection on reducing pain , incidence of headache , of fecal and gas incontenency , pruritus , rate of inability to attend work or school , use of systemic analgesic and reducing complication based on age and gender after Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
-
Design
-
A prospective, randomized, open‑label clinical trial was conducted on 66 patients. Randomization was performed using Stata software version 14.2 with the stsyntax command.
-
Settings and conduct
-
The patients will be evaluated based on three study groups in terms of pain and other complications, which have been included as secondary outcomes in the questionnaire, and will be assessed on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 by a surgery resident.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
All patient over 18 years of age with internal,External or mixed hemorrhoids of grade 3 or 4 diagnosed are candidates for Millian -Morgan hemorrhoidectomy exclude
Grade I and II hemorrhoids; the presence of other perianal pathologies including fissure, fistula, and malignancy; thrombosed hemorrhoids; history of previous perianal surgery; need for concomitant sphincterotomy; history of ischemic heart disease; heart block; pregnancy; severe hypertension; orthostatic hypotension; current use of calcium channel blockers; history of allergy to botox; and poor general condition for anesthesia corresponding to class IV or V according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.
-
Intervention groups
-
One third of the patients will be randomly assigned to receive topical diltiazem, another one third will undergo local botox injection, and in the remaining one third, as the control group, vaseline will be used as a placebo.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Comparison of the effect of topical diltiazem, as a low-cost and readily available method, with the more expensive Botox injection