-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cambridge Vision Stimulator Therapy, Sham Cambridge Vision Stimulator Therapy, and Occlusion Therapy in Improving Corrected Distance Visual Acuity in Patients with Unilateral Functional Amblyopia
-
Design
-
A randomized interventional clinical trial with a parallel design and a total sample size of 132 participants (44 participants in each group)
-
Settings and conduct
-
This randomized clinical trial will be conducted at the Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. All assessments and interventions will be performed by trained optometrists according to a standardized protocol. (No additional space!)
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Participants: Children aged 4–8 years with unilateral functional amblyopia.
Inclusion criteria: Age 4–8 years, unilateral functional amblyopia, corrected distance visual acuity worse than 0.1 logMAR in the amblyopic eye, presence of anisometropia, strabismus, or both, no previous amblyopia treatment except refractive correction, cooperation of the child and written informed consent from parents.
Exclusion criteria: Organic amblyopia, ocular or systemic diseases affecting vision, history of strabismus surgery or prior amblyopia treatment, poor compliance with optical correction, incomplete therapy sessions, or concurrent amblyopia treatments.
-
Intervention groups
-
Cambridge Vision Stimulator Treatment Group:
Receiving treatment using the Cambridge Vision Stimulator.
Sham Cambridge Vision Stimulator Treatment Group:
Receiving sham treatment with the Cambridge Vision Stimulator using gray plates.
Occlusion Treatment Group:
Receiving occlusion therapy according to standard guidelines
-
Main outcome variables
-
Change in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of the amblyopic eye measured using the ETDRS logMAR chart