-
Study aim
-
The aim of this study is to evaluate, within a controlled clinical trial, the effectiveness of group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy compared to group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in reducing academic procrastination and difficulties in emotion regulation.
-
Design
-
This clinical trial comprises three parallel groups (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (n=15), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (n=15), and a wait-list (n=15)). The study employs a double-blind design, with randomization conducted using the Random Number Generator v.3 software.
-
Settings and conduct
-
The study investigates the effectiveness of psychological interventions. Eligible participants, selected through sampling from students of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, are assigned to one of the three study groups and receive the corresponding intervention based on their allocation. The interventions will be delivered at Shahid Beheshti Psychiatric Hospital in Zanjan. In the final stage, both the outcome assessor and the statistical analyst will be blinded to the group assignments of the participants.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion Criteria:
Residence in the city of Zanjan, Ability to attend all treatment sessions, Scoring above the cutoff point on the screening questionnaires
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior therapeutic history related to procrastination (more than five sessions), Absence from more than two consecutive intervention sessions, Failure to complete the assessment measures
-
Intervention groups
-
Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): 8 sessions based on the protocol of Salsman and Nathan (2008)
Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): 8 sessions based on Steven C. Hayes, Kirk D. Strosahl, and Kelly G. Wilson (2011) protocol
Waiting List Group: 8 session after finishing the study.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Academic procrastination; Difficulty in Emotion Regulation