-
Study aim
-
Comparison of the therapeutic outcomes of intra‑articular distal radius fractures treated with locking plate alone versus locking plate combined with external fixator.
-
Design
-
The present study is an open‑label, parallel‑group randomized clinical trial (using block randomization) conducted on 64 patients.
-
Settings and conduct
-
In this open‑label randomized clinical trial, patients who are candidates for distal radius surgery at Vali‑Asr Hospital in Arak will be randomly assigned to two groups (A and B) using block randomization. Blinding will not be performed due to the nature of the study, and the study outcomes will ultimately be compared between the two groups.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18–60 years with intra‑articular distal radius fractures; surgical intervention performed within a maximum of 10 days after injury; and provision of written informed consent to participate in the study and attend follow‑up visits at 2 weeks and at 1, 2, and 6 months.
Exclusion criteria: Open fractures or contamination of the surgical site; Presence of uncontrolled diabetes, renal failure, or long‑term corticosteroid use.
-
Intervention groups
-
Group I (Volar Locking Plate, VLP): Patients undergo open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) via the volar Henry approach. After anatomical reduction of fracture fragments, a volar locking plate is applied to the distal radius and fixation is confirmed with fluoroscopy.
Group II (VLP + External Fixator): After ORIF with a volar locking plate as described above, a dynamic bridging external fixator is additionally applied based on the principle of ligamentotaxis to enhance stability and maintain reduction.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Range of motion of the wrist joint, pain score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Wrist Score, and time to return to work.