-
Study aim
-
To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of laminectomy alone, laminectomy with non instrumented arthrodesis, and laminectomy with instrumented posterior fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
-
Design
-
Randomized controlled, three arm, parallel group clinical trial including 120 patients. Participants were randomly allocated equally to three treatment groups. Recruitment was completed over a three month period.
-
Settings and conduct
-
The trial was conducted at Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia, Iran. Eligible patients were enrolled after informed consent. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed before surgery and during follow up at three months, nine months, and the final visit.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Adults with symptomatic multilevel degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and persistent low back or leg pain despite at least six months of conservative treatment. Exclusion criteria: previous surgery at the same level, active infection, spinal instability, severe degenerative scoliosis, or sagittal imbalance.
-
Intervention groups
-
Group 1, laminectomy alone; Group 2, laminectomy with non instrumented arthrodesis; Group 3, laminectomy with instrumented posterior fusion using pedicle screw fixation. Standard perioperative care will be identical in all groups.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Low back pain; leg pain; lumbar lordosis; distal lumbar lordosis; proximal segmental lordosis; proximal junctional kyphosis; patient satisfaction after surgery.