-
Study aim
-
To compare the efficacy of conventional radiofrequency (CRF) and pulsed radiofrequency combined with conventional radiofrequency (PRF+CRF) in reducing pain intensity, improving quality of life, and reducing treatment-related adverse events in patients with drug-resistant classical trigeminal neuralgia.
-
Design
-
Randomized, single-blind, parallel-group clinical trial with 1:1 allocation. Block randomization with block size 4 will be used. Total sample size is 28.
-
Settings and conduct
-
This randomized clinical trial will be conducted at the Pain Clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Eligible participants will be enrolled after providing written informed consent and randomly allocated to the CRF or PCRF group. The study is single-blind, with participants and outcome assessors blinded to treatment allocation. Participants will be followed for 3 months.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria: Age 18–80 years, classical trigeminal neuralgia (ICHD-3), ≥50% pain reduction after diagnostic block, ASA I–II, written informed consent, and failure of standard two- or three-drug therapy. Exclusion criteria: Secondary trigeminal neuralgia, coagulopathy or non-discontinuable anticoagulant therapy, active infection, allergy to lidocaine or dexamethasone, previous trigeminal RF or surgery, unstable cardiopulmonary disease, pregnancy, or breastfeeding.
-
Intervention groups
-
Group 1: Conventional radiofrequency (CRF). Group 2: Pulsed radiofrequency combined with conventional radiofrequency (PCRF). Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Pain intensity measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); quality of life assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire; treatment-related adverse events.