-
Study aim
-
The aim is to compare optimal movement smoothness and dynamic stability under different attentional strategies in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.
-
Design
-
Two-group quasi-experimental study with repeated measures. Participants with and without mild cognitive impairment will perform perturbation walking under four attentional conditions. Participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to group status; researchers will not be blinded. Trial phase: not applicable.
-
Settings and conduct
-
After screening, participants will be classified into groups with and without mild cognitive impairment. Each participant will perform perturbation walking and obstacle crossing under four attentional conditions: baseline, internal focus, near external focus, and far external focus. Kinematic data will be collected at the Sport Sciences Laboratory, Yazd University, and analyzed to assess dynamic stability, movement smoothness, and optimal motor control.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Participants will be adults aged 60–80 years who walk independently and will be classified as having or not having mild cognitive impairment. Inclusion criteria are independent walking, no conditions affecting walking or balance, and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria include severe visual/hearing impairment and a severe fall within the previous six months.
-
Intervention groups
-
Participants will be assessed in two groups: with and without mild cognitive impairment, under four attentional conditions: baseline, internal, near external, and far external focus.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Optimal relative weighting of movement smoothness and dynamic stability in the multi-objective optimal control model; dynamic stability assessed by Margin of Stability (MoS), movement smoothness by linear and angular jerk, and agreement between actual and optimized movement patterns by RMSE.