Protocol summary
-
Study aim
-
To compare the added effect of 12-week individualized corrective exercise versus an active intervention on posture; EMG, range of motion, and balance are secondary, and EEG is exploratory.
-
Design
-
Two-arm parallel trial, 36 participants, 1:1 allocation, blocks of four and six, stratified by sex; assessors, signal processors, and statistician blinded.
-
Settings and conduct
-
Assessments occur at Arak University, EEG at Valiasr Hospital, and training at Diaphragm Clinic. Assessments are at baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up; EMG and EEG have no follow-up.
-
Participants/Inclusion and exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion: women and men aged 18–40 years, BMI 18.5–24.9, residing in Arak, with head ≥44°, shoulder ≥49°, and kyphosis ≥42°; consent and ability to attend.
Exclusion: relevant surgery/fracture; neurological, psychiatric, musculoskeletal, or cardiopulmonary disease; CNS medication; acute pain; pregnancy; trunk rotation >5°; balance disorder; or recent regular exercise.
-
Intervention groups
-
Intervention: 36 sessions of 60–80 minutes; active foundational intervention plus individualized staged exercise. Comparator: 36 sessions of 20–30 minutes including cycling, stretching, mobilization, and education.
-
Main outcome variables
-
Primary outcome: head, shoulder, and kyphosis angle profile at week 12. EMG, range of motion, and balance are secondary; EEG is exploratory.
General information
-
Reason for update
-
Due to the armed conflict and its consequences, including disrupted access to the study sites, restrictions on the operation of collaborating centers, and the absence of safe conditions for participant recruitment and assessment, the study could not begin as originally scheduled. Consequently, study implementation was postponed, and the study timeline and protocol details were reviewed and updated before the enrollment and randomization of the first participant. At the time of this update, no participant had been randomized and no outcome data had been collected or analyzed.
-
Acronym
-
ISCEP
-
IRCT registration information
-
IRCT registration number:
IRCT20250921067305N1
Registration date:
2025-11-12, 1404/08/21
Registration timing:
prospective
Last update:
2026-08-31, 1405/06/09
Update count:
1
-
Registration date
-
2025-11-12, 1404/08/21
-
Registrant information
-
-
Recruitment status
-
Not yet recruiting
-
Funding source
-
-
Expected recruitment start date
-
2026-11-22, 1405/09/01
-
Expected recruitment end date
-
2026-12-22, 1405/10/01
-
Actual recruitment start date
-
empty
-
Actual recruitment end date
-
empty
-
Trial completion date
-
empty
-
Scientific title
-
The effect of adding an individualized staged corrective-exercise program to a foundational active intervention on the postural profile of adults meeting prespecified postural criteria for upper crossed syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
-
Public title
-
Individualized staged corrective exercise in adults with an upper crossed syndrome postural phenotype
-
Purpose
-
Supportive
-
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria:
Female or male, aged 18–40 years, and residing in Arak
Concurrent presence of a forward-head angle of at least 44 degrees, a forward-shoulder angle of at least 49 degrees, and thoracic kyphosis of at least 42 degrees
Body mass index of 18.5–24.9 kg/m²
Ability to complete the assessments and exercise program safely
Willingness to maintain the usual pattern of physical activity and refrain from beginning a new structured exercise program outside the study
Ability to attend intervention sessions and study assessments
Provision of written informed consent before formal assessment
Exclusion criteria:
History of surgery or fracture affecting the spine, shoulder girdle, or pelvis
A diagnosed neurological, psychiatric, or musculoskeletal condition that could compromise safety or confound the outcomes
Use of medication affecting the central nervous system
Acute pain or uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease
Pregnancy
An angle of trunk rotation greater than five degrees during the forward-bending test
A lower-limb or pelvic disorder that precludes valid balance testing
Regular participation in corrective exercise, resistance training, or manual therapy during the preceding three months
-
Age
-
From 18 years old to 40 years old
-
Gender
-
Both
-
Phase
-
N/A
-
Groups that have been masked
-
- Outcome assessor
- Data analyser
- Data and Safety Monitoring Board
-
Sample size
-
Target sample size:
36
-
Randomization (investigator's opinion)
-
Randomized
-
Randomization description
-
After completion of baseline assessment, an independent statistician will generate the allocation sequence using randomly permuted blocks of four and six, with a 1:1 allocation ratio and stratification by sex. Block sizes and the allocation sequence will remain concealed from personnel involved in recruitment and assessment. Allocation will be concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, tamper-evident, sealed envelopes. The next envelope will be opened only after eligibility has been confirmed, baseline assessment completed, and the participant irreversibly enrolled, by a person who has no access to the allocation sequence.
-
Blinding (investigator's opinion)
-
Single blinded
-
Blinding description
-
Because of the nature of the intervention, participants and the intervention provider cannot be blinded. Outcome assessors, EMG and EEG processors, and the statistician will remain blinded to group allocation until completion of the primary analysis. Images, Formetric outputs, and signal files will be coded without group or time-point information and presented in random order. The code key will be held by an independent person, and any inadvertent unblinding will be documented.
-
Placebo
-
Not used
-
Assignment
-
Parallel
-
Other design features
-
Ethics committees
1
-
Ethics committee
-
-
Approval date
-
2025-05-31, 1404/03/10
-
Ethics committee reference number
-
IR.UI.REC.1404.053
Health conditions studied
1
-
Description of health condition studied
-
Upper Crossed Syndrome
-
ICD-10 code
-
R29.3
-
ICD-10 code description
-
Abnormal posture
Primary outcomes
1
-
Description
-
Forward-head angle; the first component of the multivariate primary postural outcome. A lower angle is favorable.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up; the primary comparison is at week 12.
-
Method of measurement
-
Mean of three lateral photographs; C7–tragus angle relative to the vertical, calculated using AutoCAD 2025.
2
-
Description
-
Forward-shoulder angle; the second component of the multivariate primary postural outcome. A lower angle is favorable.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up; the primary comparison is at week 12
-
Method of measurement
-
Mean of three lateral photographs; C7–acromion angle relative to the vertical, calculated using AutoCAD 2025.
3
-
Description
-
Thoracic-kyphosis angle; the third component of the multivariate primary postural outcome. A lower angle is favorable.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up; the primary comparison is at week 12.
-
Method of measurement
-
Mean of six DIERS formetric 4D scans; ICT–ITL angle calculated using DICAM 3.
Secondary outcomes
1
-
Description
-
Normalized RMS amplitude of the dominant-side upper, middle, and lower trapezius and serratus anterior.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline and week 12
-
Method of measurement
-
Eight-channel wireless Noraxon surface EMG; MVIC normalization and mean of three valid seven-second trials.
2
-
Description
-
Description: UT/MT, UT/LT, and UT/SA ratios based on normalized whole-task EMG amplitude.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline and week 12
-
Method of measurement
-
Ratios calculated from the mean normalized RMS of three valid trials.
3
-
Description
-
Active flexion range of motion of the dominant shoulder.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up.
-
Method of measurement
-
Mean of three measurements using a 360-degree universal goniometer.
4
-
Description
-
Active external-rotation range of motion of the dominant shoulder.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up.
-
Method of measurement
-
Mean of three measurements using a 360-degree universal goniometer.
5
-
Description
-
Active cervical-flexion range of motion
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up.
-
Method of measurement
-
Mean of three measurements using a 360-degree universal goniometer.
6
-
Description
-
Mean center-of-pressure velocity during eyes-open and eyes-closed Romberg tests.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up.
-
Method of measurement
-
Mean of three valid 30-second trials measured using DIERS Pedoscan.
7
-
Description
-
Lower Quarter Y-Balance composite score of the dominant limb.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline, week 12, and four-week follow-up.
-
Method of measurement
-
Maximum reach in three directions normalized to limb length; three valid trials.
8
-
Description
-
Change in central relative alpha power, averaged across C3, Cz, and C4, during quiet standing with eyes open; exploratory EEG outcome.
-
Timepoint
-
Baseline and week 12
-
Method of measurement
-
Recorded using 24-channel EEG 3840 at 500 Hz; relative alpha power from 8 to <13 Hz calculated using EEGLAB 2026.0.0.
Intervention groups
1
-
Description
-
The intervention group will receive three sessions per week for 12 weeks, totaling 36 sessions. Each session will last approximately 60–80 minutes and comprise 10 minutes of stationary cycling, one to two minutes of transition and preparation, 40–55 minutes of main exercise, and 5–10 minutes of cool-down, stretching, or indication-based manual techniques. In addition to the components shared by both groups, the individualized staged program comprises overlapping stages addressing breathing and trunk control, restoration of mobility, retraining of muscle activation and coordination, basic movements, fundamental and functional movement patterns, and progression toward load tolerance and health-related physical fitness. Exercise selection, regression, and progression will follow prespecified criteria and individual response. Sessions will be delivered individually or to no more than three participants per provider.
-
Category
-
Lifestyle
2
-
Description
-
The active-comparator group will attend three sessions per week for 12 weeks, totaling 36 sessions. Each session will last approximately 20–30 minutes and comprise 10 minutes of stationary cycling, indication-based stretching of target muscles, prespecified mobilizations, and education on healthy movement habits. The type, sequence, and dose of the shared components will match the corresponding components in the intervention group. This group will not receive exercises based on the staged model, retraining of muscle activation and coordination, training of basic or complex movement patterns, individualized progression of load and task, or the specific transition toward health-related physical fitness. Participants will continue their usual activities and will not begin a new structured exercise program outside the study.
-
Category
-
Lifestyle
1
-
Sponsor
-
-
Grant name
-
-
Grant code / Reference number
-
-
Is the source of funding the same sponsor organization/entity?
-
Yes
-
Title of funding source
-
The University of Isfahan
-
Proportion provided by this source
-
100
-
Public or private sector
-
Public
-
Domestic or foreign origin
-
Domestic
-
Category of foreign source of funding
-
empty
-
Country of origin
-
-
Type of organization providing the funding
-
Academic
Sharing plan
-
Deidentified Individual Participant Data Set (IPD)
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Study Protocol
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Statistical Analysis Plan
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Informed Consent Form
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Clinical Study Report
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Analytic Code
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Data Dictionary
-
Yes - There is a plan to make this available
-
Title and more details about the data/document
-
The approved protocol, amendments, statistical analysis plan, data dictionary, analytic code, and the deidentified individual-level minimal dataset will be deposited in a stable public repository when the trial results are published. Coded assessment photographs and videos and raw biosignals that may carry a residual risk of re-identification will not be made publicly available and may be requested only through controlled-access procedures.
-
When the data will become available and for how long
-
Publicly shareable files will be deposited in a stable repository when the primary trial results are published and will remain available indefinitely or according to repository policy. Requests for controlled access to sensitive data may be considered after publication of the trial results.
-
To whom data/document is available
-
The deidentified minimal dataset, data dictionary, and analytic code will be available to researchers through a public repository. Access to sensitive data will require a specific and justified scientific purpose, approval by the relevant institutional body or ethics committee, and execution of a data-use agreement. Access decisions will not be controlled by a single author.
-
Under which criteria data/document could be used
-
Performing statistical analyses within the scope of published articles related to the present research is permissible. However, the misuse of data to extract new findings is strictly prohibited.
-
From where data/document is obtainable
-
The public repository link will be added to the trial record and results article when available. Requests for controlled access to sensitive data should be submitted to the institutional email address m.khorami@spr.ui.ac.ir and should specify the research purpose, requested data, analysis plan, institutional or ethics approval, and data-protection plan. Requests will be reviewed by the relevant institutional body and research team; approved access will be provided under a data-use agreement.
-
What processes are involved for a request to access data/document
-
The applicant must provide a compelling and specific justification for requesting the data. Upon receipt of the request, they will be notified that their application is under review. Following approval by the research team, the data will be made available to the applicant within one month from the start of the request review.
-
Comments
-